Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Natalie Serber's avatar

I had a conversation with a young twenty-something last week about exactly this. Their position was opposed, being in love with life was not enough, not purposeful, and in their view bordered on selfish. They are at a time of angst and turmoil and energy, they are flummoxed by all they want for themselves and the world and by hurdles and politics, seeking love and work and their tribe of friends. For them loving life is something to do when one is old! Oh honey, I want to say.

I may have felt that way at 20 as well. But now I think loving life is the most daring and political and gorgeous thing we can do. For me, loving life is loving people. Family, friends, neighbors, loose connections, close connections-that brings joy. Loving nature, getting out in it. Art! Moving my body. All of it makes me a better contributor to the world.

Thanks, Jen. Love this and now I want to find my own slow read! Middlemarch anyone?

Expand full comment
Paula Trucks-Pape's avatar

I've been reading and thinking about "purpose" in life -- you know, "living life on purpose" and "finding your purpose," etc. There's another side to that coin: a "purposeless" life (German speakers, see https://youtu.be/94YQKzsD02c ). Purpose implies cause and effect: if I have a purpose, or goal, I pursue certain activites or thoughts to achieve a related outcome, which in mainstream USA society can easily entrap us in the endless hamster wheel of "if this, then that, if this..." But loving life and helping other love it is amorphously individual and simultaneously collective. It sends feelers out into the world (or streamers: remember the rainbow streamers we folks at a Taos retreat once imagined as we all returned to our abodes?). And those feelers create a vast web in which cause and effect is no longer discernable, we stop aiming at specific outcomes and let the connections surprise and nourish us. Love this!

Expand full comment
62 more comments...

No posts